I was
struck by a statistic I heard at a seminar concerning unresolved conflict in
marriages. The statistic was this:
69% of
conflict in troubled marriages never gets resolved.
Well, I
thought, that makes sense. How can we have a good marriage if we can never
resolve conflict? But the surprising statistic I heard was this:
69% of
conflict in happy marriages never gets resolved.
Wow,
if it’s exactly the same, what then is the difference?
I thought
about it for a while and it occurred to me that it must directly relate to our
perception of the conflict. Or probably more accurately it relates to my belief
about my spouse, during the time I am in conflict with her. If I
believe that she is not for me, or more harshly, that she is against
me – I am likely to view the conflict as compounding evidence that the
relationship is in trouble. If, on the other hand, I can remember that this
person that I love, and loves me in return, is just not in agreement with me at
the moment, I am able to see the relationship in a much better light.
It really
comes down to assuming positive intent on the part of the other person
(innocent until proven guilty). As I like to tell my wife when things get edgy
between the two of us:
Assume I’m
the good guy!
Just
that simple statement sometimes brings enough perspective for us to get through
the impasse. Of course, I also have to check my attitude and make sure I have
positive intent. And sometimes if my attitude is at a fork in the road, her belief in my positive intent motivates me to take the right road.
But it is
true that many things in our relationship just don’t get resolved. When it
comes to money I am a saver by nature. She is less conservative – and that
tension will always exist. My wife is always ready to say ‘yes’ to a party,
whereas I want to have time to think about it first before making a decision. I
could list many other instances where we are not in agreement. But we don’t
assume that the other person is trying to make our life difficult. We just have
different preferences. So we make compromises and try to work with each other
the best that we can.
I think we can apply this same thinking to all sorts of
interpersonal relationships as well. How about work relationships between
co-workers or employer and employee? How about those going through a
relationship break-up or even a divorce? It doesn’t have to be hostile. That is
why we really like divorce mediators over divorce lawyers. Mediation assumes
cooperation over antagonism, seeking the best possible outcome in a sad process.
So really
the only difference between happy and troubled is a core belief. In our
relationship our core belief is that we are for each other. How about
you? What do you believe about your relationships?
Thanks Dave,
ReplyDeleteFor your blog,it reminds me that it's good to check myself in my relationship and what role I play. Then I can adjust myself.